JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 10, 2019

A- de 2019

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Diana Constanza Fajardo Rivera

✓Claimant Carlos Arturo Castro Gomez

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Incidente De Desacato
  • Improcedencia respecto de providencias proferidas en desarrollo del control de inconstitucionalidad
Sentencias De La Corte Constitucional
  • Valor de cosa juzgada constitucional y obligatorio cumplimiento para autoridades y particulares
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de cumplimiento de la Sentencia C-171/12.

El memorialista le pide a la Corte exigir al Defensor del Pueblo el cumplimiento de la providencia de la referencia, la cual prohíbe que mediante contratos de prestación de servicios se cumplan funciones permanentes delas entidades, para lo cual, se deben crear los empleos correspondientes.

Luego de analizar la petición formulada la Sala Plena decidió RECHAZARLA por improcedente.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. RECHAZAR, por improcedente, la solicitud de cumplimiento de la Sentencias C-171 de 2012, presentada por Carlos Arturo Castro Gómez.
  2. Segundo. DAR TRASLADO del escrito de Carlos Arturo Castro Gómez a la Contraloría General de la República, a la Procuraduría General de la Nación, al Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social y al Ministerio de Trabajo, para lo de sus respectivas competencias.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.